Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Rev. chil. obstet. ginecol ; 80(1): 12-17, 2015. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-743829

ABSTRACT

ANTECEDENTES: La evaluación precisa de la proteinuria constituye un pilar importante para el diagnóstico del síndrome hipertensivo del embarazo (SHE). El estándar dorado para esta medición es la recolección de orina en 24 horas, pero debido a la duración de la toma de la muestra, alternativas como la albuminuria semicuantitativa se utiliza con mayor frecuencia en los servicios de urgencia de nuestro país. OBJETIVO: Evaluar el rendimiento diagnóstico de la albuminuria semicuantitativa y su asociación con proteinuria de 24 horas en pacientes con SHE. MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo de 145 pacientes con sospecha de SHE atendidas en el Hospital Padre Hurtado, Chile. A todas las pacientes se le realizó albuminuria semicuantitativa (categorizada entre 0+ y 4+) y proteinuria de 24 horas (positivo si >0,3 gramos/24 horas). Se realizó análisis por grupos compuestos de albuminuria semicuantitativa y resultado positivo en proteinuria de 24 horas. RESULTADOS: Se evidenció una sensibilidad de 50%, especificidad de 100%, VPP de 100%, VPN de 65,7%, LR+ de 50 y un LR- de 0,5. CONCLUSIÓN: La albuminuria semicuantitativa ≥2+ muestra una fuerte asociación con proteinuria ≥0,3 g/24 horas y es un método rápido para evaluar SHE.


BACKGROUND: One of the basis for the diagnosis of pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome (PIHS), includes the precise evaluation of proteinuria. The gold standard for its evaluation is the collection of a 24-hour urine specimen, but because it is a slow method, other alternatives, such as semi-quantitative albuminuria have been used more frequently on our emergency rooms. OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of semi-quantitative albuminuria and its association with proteinuria measured in a 24-hour urine specimen collection, in patients with PIHS. METHODS: Retrospective study of 145 patients with clinical suspicion of PIHS who assisted to Hospital Padre Hurtado, Chile. Semi-quantitative albuminuria (categorized as 0 to 4+) and proteinuria measured in a 24-hour urine specimen collection was measured on every patient. Abnormal values of proteinuria were considered when values exceeded 0.3 g/24 hours. Composite outcomes analysis was done between albuminuria groups and positive proteinuria in 24 hrs. RESULTS: Sensibility and specificity of semi-quantitative albuminuria was of 50% and 100%, respectively, with a PPV: 100%, NPV: 65.7%, LR+: 50 and a LR-: 0.5. CONCLUSION: semi-quantitative albuminuria ≥2+ shows a strong association with proteinuria ≥0.3 g/24 hours and it could be used as a fast method to assess PIHS.


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Young Adult , Urinalysis/methods , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/urine , Albuminuria/urine , Proteinuria/urine , Syndrome , Time Factors , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Journal of the Faculty of Medicine-Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. 2007; 31 (1): 49-53
in Persian | IMEMR | ID: emr-83684

ABSTRACT

Postoperative nausea and vomiting [PONV] is among the most common complications after anesthesia. This study aimed to compare pre-induction use of placebo and dexamethasone on decreasing the incidence of nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy in a group of Iranian women. In this double-blind clinical trial, 42 patients undergoing thyroidectomy were randomly divided into two groups of equal size. Before the induction of anesthesia, normal saline was injected in placebo [P] group while 10mg dexamethasone was administered for the case group. The incidence of nausea and vomiting was recorded in recovery room, and during the first 24 hours following the surgery. The incidence of nausea and vomiting showed a statistically significant decrease in patients receiving dexamethasone [p < 0.0001]. Use of 10mg dexamethasone before the induction of anesthesia may remarkably decrease the incidence of PONV, and is recommended for high risk groups especially in outpatient surgeries


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Urine , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/urine , Pregnancy , Pre-Eclampsia/diagnosis , Predictive Value of Tests
3.
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-43230

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the first 4-hour urinary protein - creatinine ratio for prediction of the significant proteinuria in preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test SUBJECTS: One hundred and sixty-four pregnant women who were initially diagnosed with hypertensive disorder and hospitalized in the obstetric ward and labor room at Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical Collage and Vajira Hospital between July 2005 and April 2006. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Urine samples were collected within 24 hours in two consecutive periods: the first 4 hours and the next 20 hours. The urine volume, urine protein and creatinine concentration were separately measured and the first 4-hour urinary protein - creatinine ratio were calculated. With the use of a protein level > or = 300 mg in 24 hours urine collection as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of the first 4-hour urinary protein-creatinine ratio for diagnosis of significant proteinuria were determined with cutoffs range. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty four patients were recruited for this study including 112 patients (68.3%) who had preeclampsia. The first 4-hour urinary protein-creatinine ratio was most accurate for diagnosis of preeclampsia is 0.30 with 81% sensitivity, 88% specificity, PPV of 93%, and NPV of 71%. CONCLUSION: The first 4-hour urinary protein-creatinine ratio at 0.3 is the most accurate value for diagnosis of significant proteinuria in preeclampsia


Subject(s)
Creatinine/urine , Female , Humans , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/urine , Kidney Function Tests , Pre-Eclampsia/physiopathology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications , Prospective Studies , Proteins/analysis , Proteinuria/diagnosis , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Urinalysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL